Fortunately, I neither stated a claim nor falsely represented scientific information. In fact, the opposite has occurred. My position has remained that we do not know when we cross into the threshold of ‘danger’ on TRT. The scientific evidence provided from the burdened party (you) has always been arcane rodent studies with extrapolated findings.
As I’ve said before, the cardiovascular event has left a less than objective mark, resulting in a heavily biased research methodology.
There is no question that a threshold that represents entry into a danger zone on TRT exists. However, scientific evidence to-date does not elucidate its location.
This parties position: We don’t know when we enter into a danger zone. There aren’t enough human studies to determine this.
Your Position: Anything above reference range (physiological) is putting one at risk. PROVE IT with applicable data.
#cuttheshit
