ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Nandrolone Experiences
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="slicktop" data-source="post: 181632" data-attributes="member: 39800"><p>There was a time when the notion of a round earth was laughed at, also. The atom was considered the smallest particle for most of our lifetimes. Things change. I'd laugh right at a doctor's face if he tried to put me on a statin at that level. There's more and more research showing the current take on cholesterol is likely very wrong:</p><p></p><p>"No evidence exists to prove that having high levels of bad cholesterol causes heart disease, leading physicians have claimed" in the study, <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-6176151/No-evidence-having-high-levels-bad-cholesterol-causes-heart-disease.html" target="_blank">reports</a> the <em>Daily Mail</em>. The <em>Express</em> likewise <a href="https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/1018993/health-news-statins-cholesterol-study-cardiovascular-disease" target="_blank">says</a> the new study finds "no evidence that high levels of 'bad' cholesterol cause heart disease."</p><p>"In fact researchers have known for decades from nutrition studies that LDL-C is not strongly correlated with cardiac risk," says Nina Teicholz, an investigative journalist and author of <em>The</em> <em>New York Times</em> bestseller <a href="https://thebigfatsurprise.com/" target="_blank"><em>The Big Fat Surprise</em></a> (along with a great recent <em>Wall St. Journal</em> <a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/carbs-good-for-you-fat-chance-1536705397" target="_blank">op-ed</a> highlighting ongoing flaws in federal dietary advice). In an email to me this week, she pointed out that "physicians continue focusing on LDL-C in part because they have drugs to lower it. Doctors are driven by incentives to prescribe pills for nutrition-related diseases rather than better nutrition—a far healthier and more natural approach."</p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://reason.com/2018/09/22/new-research-confirms-we-got-cholesterol/[/URL]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="slicktop, post: 181632, member: 39800"] There was a time when the notion of a round earth was laughed at, also. The atom was considered the smallest particle for most of our lifetimes. Things change. I'd laugh right at a doctor's face if he tried to put me on a statin at that level. There's more and more research showing the current take on cholesterol is likely very wrong: "No evidence exists to prove that having high levels of bad cholesterol causes heart disease, leading physicians have claimed" in the study, [URL='https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-6176151/No-evidence-having-high-levels-bad-cholesterol-causes-heart-disease.html']reports[/URL] the [I]Daily Mail[/I]. The [I]Express[/I] likewise [URL='https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/1018993/health-news-statins-cholesterol-study-cardiovascular-disease']says[/URL] the new study finds "no evidence that high levels of 'bad' cholesterol cause heart disease." "In fact researchers have known for decades from nutrition studies that LDL-C is not strongly correlated with cardiac risk," says Nina Teicholz, an investigative journalist and author of [I]The[/I] [I]New York Times[/I] bestseller [URL='https://thebigfatsurprise.com/'][I]The Big Fat Surprise[/I][/URL] (along with a great recent [I]Wall St. Journal[/I] [URL='https://www.wsj.com/articles/carbs-good-for-you-fat-chance-1536705397']op-ed[/URL] highlighting ongoing flaws in federal dietary advice). In an email to me this week, she pointed out that "physicians continue focusing on LDL-C in part because they have drugs to lower it. Doctors are driven by incentives to prescribe pills for nutrition-related diseases rather than better nutrition—a far healthier and more natural approach." [URL unfurl="true"]https://reason.com/2018/09/22/new-research-confirms-we-got-cholesterol/[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Nandrolone Experiences
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top