ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Nandrolone Experiences
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DS3" data-source="post: 169668" data-attributes="member: 18514"><p>Been looking up Taeian Clark. So it says that he specializes in nutrition and bodybuilding. No mention of graduate-level pharmacology degree or any type of credentials (also clearly evidenced in his level of writing). </p><p></p><p>Look, I get it. A lot of people can read studies and pull main points from them without a degree, and potentially even weave together loose correlations and form hypotheses from this data. However, it really stops there. Taeian Clark's assertions are hypotheses at best, pseudoscience at worst. </p><p></p><p>[USER=15043]@Gman86[/USER] The only thing I am asking is that you don't come on this forum, one of the few forums that are supposed to present and discuss scientific evidence (not from bro sources, just go to peaktestosterone or somewhere else for that), and state bro-science from guys like Taeian Clark like it is fact. </p><p></p><p>You can, by all means, come on here and say, "There is an interesting guy with a hypothesis about deca...", but please don't come on here and say, "Deca sensitizes the E2 and prolactin receptors, as well as causes issues through DHN and DHT competition, etc. etc." You know that Taeian Clark is not a reliable scientific source, so please don't state assertions from him like it is.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DS3, post: 169668, member: 18514"] Been looking up Taeian Clark. So it says that he specializes in nutrition and bodybuilding. No mention of graduate-level pharmacology degree or any type of credentials (also clearly evidenced in his level of writing). Look, I get it. A lot of people can read studies and pull main points from them without a degree, and potentially even weave together loose correlations and form hypotheses from this data. However, it really stops there. Taeian Clark's assertions are hypotheses at best, pseudoscience at worst. [USER=15043]@Gman86[/USER] The only thing I am asking is that you don't come on this forum, one of the few forums that are supposed to present and discuss scientific evidence (not from bro sources, just go to peaktestosterone or somewhere else for that), and state bro-science from guys like Taeian Clark like it is fact. You can, by all means, come on here and say, "There is an interesting guy with a hypothesis about deca...", but please don't come on here and say, "Deca sensitizes the E2 and prolactin receptors, as well as causes issues through DHN and DHT competition, etc. etc." You know that Taeian Clark is not a reliable scientific source, so please don't state assertions from him like it is. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Nandrolone Experiences
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top