ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Health & Fitness
Nutrition and Supplements
NAD, Hype Or Miracle Molecule?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JPB" data-source="post: 145086" data-attributes="member: 2659"><p>False. It is you that needs to re-listen. Masterjohn clearly supports what I am saying. He states clearly the NR that gets past the liver is negligible. Precursors are distributed by the liver as NAM. Masterjohn reasons he'd rather supply his liver with NAD/NAM via NR than by NAM itself, which I do not agree with. Masterjohn only uses 150 mg NR daily. He has issues flooding the system with NAM (or NR apparently). This comes down primarily to dosage and timing which negates the potential negatives. I'm not recommending anybody take 2 grams NAM daily or take it 24x7. Some due consideration of methyl donors (which applies equally to NR or NAM) may be warranted for some, but this has not been a part of our discussion. I don't think we have disagreement there. Our debate has to do with your misunderstanding of the pathways and studies which leads to your exaggerated hyping of NR. Your declarations of victory and superiority based on your ongoing "true lies" strategy are comical and short-sighted.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JPB, post: 145086, member: 2659"] False. It is you that needs to re-listen. Masterjohn clearly supports what I am saying. He states clearly the NR that gets past the liver is negligible. Precursors are distributed by the liver as NAM. Masterjohn reasons he'd rather supply his liver with NAD/NAM via NR than by NAM itself, which I do not agree with. Masterjohn only uses 150 mg NR daily. He has issues flooding the system with NAM (or NR apparently). This comes down primarily to dosage and timing which negates the potential negatives. I'm not recommending anybody take 2 grams NAM daily or take it 24x7. Some due consideration of methyl donors (which applies equally to NR or NAM) may be warranted for some, but this has not been a part of our discussion. I don't think we have disagreement there. Our debate has to do with your misunderstanding of the pathways and studies which leads to your exaggerated hyping of NR. Your declarations of victory and superiority based on your ongoing "true lies" strategy are comical and short-sighted. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
General Health & Fitness
Nutrition and Supplements
NAD, Hype Or Miracle Molecule?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top