ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Health & Fitness
Nutrition and Supplements
NAD, Hype Or Miracle Molecule?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Will Brink" data-source="post: 144799" data-attributes="member: 2074"><p>False. There's nothing miseasding in that article nor anything posted here.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>False, and paper supplied showing such. You're looking less and less informed on this topic with each post now.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, false, and data supplied. It's interesting to note (which you'd understand if you read/understood the papers supplied...) that CD38 degrades NAD and NMN, but apparantly not NR. That's bodes well for NR as a tharapy over NMN. That's a most interesting finding, and may lead, as data suggests to higher NAD+ levels via NR vs NMN or even NAD+ itself.</p><p></p><p>So far, other than "it works for me" and repeatedly demonstrating you're not as well informed as you think you are, you have supplied jack chit for your opinions. While I agree 100% more data is needed, per the article, the bulk of the data supports what I'm saying.</p><p></p><p>Supply some actual data that counters anything I am saying, vs repeating incorrect statements shown false.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Will Brink, post: 144799, member: 2074"] False. There's nothing miseasding in that article nor anything posted here. False, and paper supplied showing such. You're looking less and less informed on this topic with each post now. Again, false, and data supplied. It's interesting to note (which you'd understand if you read/understood the papers supplied...) that CD38 degrades NAD and NMN, but apparantly not NR. That's bodes well for NR as a tharapy over NMN. That's a most interesting finding, and may lead, as data suggests to higher NAD+ levels via NR vs NMN or even NAD+ itself. So far, other than "it works for me" and repeatedly demonstrating you're not as well informed as you think you are, you have supplied jack chit for your opinions. While I agree 100% more data is needed, per the article, the bulk of the data supports what I'm saying. Supply some actual data that counters anything I am saying, vs repeating incorrect statements shown false. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
General Health & Fitness
Nutrition and Supplements
NAD, Hype Or Miracle Molecule?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top