ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Blood Test Discussion
My TRT Odyssey: Lab Results and More
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FunkOdyssey" data-source="post: 277698" data-attributes="member: 44064"><p>I don't think my results should be too discouraging because we do know many people get on well with SC injections and have great levels and results. I just think men should be aware that these differences in bioavailability and aromatization can happen in some cases. It might depend on individual factors like the concentration of esterases in your interstitial fluid, degree of vascularization of your fat tissue, differences in the specific sites chosen for SC injections, etc. </p><p></p><p>I did not have any adverse local reactions to the SC injections -- no pain, swelling, redness, firmness, nothing. I did experience all of those things when I tried to inject some UGL testosterone SC, so I am familiar with what can happen. The Hikma enanthate is beautifully tolerated SC with the lack of irritating excipients.</p><p></p><p>I was injecting with a 28G 1/2" needle 90" straight into my love handles, which is the thickest area of fat on my body. It seems possible that injecting into a thinner layer of fat might produce different results.</p><p></p><p>After the switch to IM, I am injecting with the same needles into my delts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FunkOdyssey, post: 277698, member: 44064"] I don't think my results should be too discouraging because we do know many people get on well with SC injections and have great levels and results. I just think men should be aware that these differences in bioavailability and aromatization can happen in some cases. It might depend on individual factors like the concentration of esterases in your interstitial fluid, degree of vascularization of your fat tissue, differences in the specific sites chosen for SC injections, etc. I did not have any adverse local reactions to the SC injections -- no pain, swelling, redness, firmness, nothing. I did experience all of those things when I tried to inject some UGL testosterone SC, so I am familiar with what can happen. The Hikma enanthate is beautifully tolerated SC with the lack of irritating excipients. I was injecting with a 28G 1/2" needle 90" straight into my love handles, which is the thickest area of fat on my body. It seems possible that injecting into a thinner layer of fat might produce different results. After the switch to IM, I am injecting with the same needles into my delts. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Blood Test Discussion
My TRT Odyssey: Lab Results and More
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top