ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone and Men's Health Articles
Much wider Free Testosterone reference range in recent research on FT levels in healthy young men
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tareload" data-source="post: 244798"><p>Madman suggests one of us grow a pair. Good point. I just started my new cycle of u-hCG.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 26px"><strong>Any practical FT by ED data set available so far can easily be fit using cFTV. </strong></span> To [USER=13851]@madman[/USER]'s point, the T<a href="https://www.excelmale.com/forum/threads/calculate-free-testosterone-with-trut-by-fpt.18468/post-145380" target="_blank">ruT algorithm fits the binding data/isotherms much better</a>, but currently the binding/isotherm data is not consistent with the practical ED measurements for FT.</p><p></p><p>Tru-T is utter *shit* (typical jargon used in peer review literature) in terms of absolute accuracy with existing FT by ED measurements on a consistent basis. Too much hype too quickly. You have to measure something accurately before you can create a decent model useful for interpolation.</p><p></p><p>NOTE: all due credit to [USER=13851]@madman[/USER] for making ExcelMale THE "go to" destination on the Internet/Planet Earth to learn and understand the details around the FT fiasco. He consistently and quickly posts up the latest research covering this topic.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tareload, post: 244798"] Madman suggests one of us grow a pair. Good point. I just started my new cycle of u-hCG. [SIZE=26px][B]Any practical FT by ED data set available so far can easily be fit using cFTV. [/B][/SIZE] To [USER=13851]@madman[/USER]'s point, the T[URL='https://www.excelmale.com/forum/threads/calculate-free-testosterone-with-trut-by-fpt.18468/post-145380']ruT algorithm fits the binding data/isotherms much better[/URL], but currently the binding/isotherm data is not consistent with the practical ED measurements for FT. Tru-T is utter *shit* (typical jargon used in peer review literature) in terms of absolute accuracy with existing FT by ED measurements on a consistent basis. Too much hype too quickly. You have to measure something accurately before you can create a decent model useful for interpolation. NOTE: all due credit to [USER=13851]@madman[/USER] for making ExcelMale THE "go to" destination on the Internet/Planet Earth to learn and understand the details around the FT fiasco. He consistently and quickly posts up the latest research covering this topic. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone and Men's Health Articles
Much wider Free Testosterone reference range in recent research on FT levels in healthy young men
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top