ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Health & Fitness
Nutrition and Supplements
Meta analysis: IF vs Standard Dieting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Will Brink" data-source="post: 87209" data-attributes="member: 2074"><p>The findings of this meta analysis on IF vs typical reduced caloric in take on weight loss is as I expected, no differences found. Basic rule is, follow what ever helps you with compliance and if IF helps people with compliance, by all means, do it, just don't think it has magical metabolic effects, at least on weight loss. </p><p></p><p>Short-term intermittent energy restriction interventions for weight management: a systematic review and meta-analysis</p><p></p><p>Summary</p><p></p><p>This systematic review synthesized the available evidence on the effect of short-term periods of intermittent energy restriction (weekly intermittent energy restriction; &#8805;7-d energy restriction) in comparison with usual care (daily continuous energy restriction), in the treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. </p><p></p><p>Six electronic databases were searched from inception to October 2016. Only randomized controlled trials of interventions (&#8805;12 weeks) in adults with overweight and obesity were included. Five studies were included in this review. Weekly intermittent energy restriction periods ranged from an energy intake between 1757 and 6276 kJ/d&#8722;1. The mean duration of the interventions was 26 (range 14 to 48) weeks.<strong> Meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in weight loss between weekly intermittent energy restriction and continuous energy restriction post-intervention (weighted mean difference: &#8722;1.36 [&#8722;3.23, 0.51], p = 0.15) and at follow-up (weighted mean difference: &#8722;0.82 [&#8722;3.76, 2.11], p = 0.58). </strong></p><p></p><p>Both interventions achieved comparable weight loss of >5 kg and therefore were associated with clinical benefits to health. The findings support the use of weekly intermittent energy restriction as an alternative option for the treatment of obesity. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support the long-term sustainable effects of weekly intermittent energy restriction on weight management.</p><p></p><p>Full Paper: </p><p></p><p><a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/obr.12593/abstract" target="_blank">http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/obr.12593/abstract</a></p><p></p><p>Will @ <a href="http://www.BrinkZone.com" target="_blank">www.BrinkZone.com</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Will Brink, post: 87209, member: 2074"] The findings of this meta analysis on IF vs typical reduced caloric in take on weight loss is as I expected, no differences found. Basic rule is, follow what ever helps you with compliance and if IF helps people with compliance, by all means, do it, just don't think it has magical metabolic effects, at least on weight loss. Short-term intermittent energy restriction interventions for weight management: a systematic review and meta-analysis Summary This systematic review synthesized the available evidence on the effect of short-term periods of intermittent energy restriction (weekly intermittent energy restriction; ≥7-d energy restriction) in comparison with usual care (daily continuous energy restriction), in the treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. Six electronic databases were searched from inception to October 2016. Only randomized controlled trials of interventions (≥12 weeks) in adults with overweight and obesity were included. Five studies were included in this review. Weekly intermittent energy restriction periods ranged from an energy intake between 1757 and 6276 kJ/d−1. The mean duration of the interventions was 26 (range 14 to 48) weeks.[B] Meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in weight loss between weekly intermittent energy restriction and continuous energy restriction post-intervention (weighted mean difference: −1.36 [−3.23, 0.51], p = 0.15) and at follow-up (weighted mean difference: −0.82 [−3.76, 2.11], p = 0.58). [/B] Both interventions achieved comparable weight loss of >5 kg and therefore were associated with clinical benefits to health. The findings support the use of weekly intermittent energy restriction as an alternative option for the treatment of obesity. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support the long-term sustainable effects of weekly intermittent energy restriction on weight management. Full Paper: [url]http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/obr.12593/abstract[/url] Will @ [url]www.BrinkZone.com[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
General Health & Fitness
Nutrition and Supplements
Meta analysis: IF vs Standard Dieting
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top