Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
Going back in time to my old test results...if I take my FT at 66.40 pg/mL and convert to ng/dL it gives only 6.64 ng/dL...and that is a very big difference from the calculated FT. I know the debate re calculations, gold-standard tests, sub-standard tests...but, even though the "calculated" FT was in a high range, I still didn't have any real positive results in how I felt. Still lacking libido.I've used the calculation method to determine its FT for my TT trough numbers in the past and none of them have correlated to feeling "dialed in".I feel I'm shooting at a moving target. When I read reports of others who have reached 14-18 ng/dL of FT on trough testing and they say: "Man, I feel great and my FT is around 2% of my overall TT amount...", what FT testing method are they using???
Going back in time to my old test results...if I take my FT at 66.40 pg/mL and convert to ng/dL it gives only 6.64 ng/dL...and that is a very big difference from the calculated FT. I know the debate re calculations, gold-standard tests, sub-standard tests...but, even though the "calculated" FT was in a high range, I still didn't have any real positive results in how I felt. Still lacking libido.
I've used the calculation method to determine its FT for my TT trough numbers in the past and none of them have correlated to feeling "dialed in".
I feel I'm shooting at a moving target. When I read reports of others who have reached 14-18 ng/dL of FT on trough testing and they say: "Man, I feel great and my FT is around 2% of my overall TT amount...", what FT testing method are they using???
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.
See further information and configure your preferences
