ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Latest Bloods. Appreciate Advice.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jurek Kletsy" data-source="post: 225783" data-attributes="member: 40983"><p>Could you be more specific? Normal physiology being defined as the reference range, is that what you mean? The same range that causes doctors to turn away patients with low T symptoms because they are “within the healthy range”?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You want me to provide evidence that the test subjects developed diabetes or cvd? How would that be possible without acces to the data? Fortunately, the burden of proof isn’t placed on those pointing out the limitations of a study, but on the researchers who compiled the data (and those using the study to support their claims). </p><p></p><p>It is, however, a medical fact that diabetes and cvd are diseases that develop slowly in unhealthy individuals. So you can either do 2 things:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Acknowledge that the studies only look at a diagnosis of diabetes and cvd, but don’t look at markers attributing to the development of these diseases, such as, ironically, low testosterone itself.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Provide evidence that the study you posted did exactly that and start by providing a link to the full text. I assume didn‘t just base am argument on methodology on the abstract of the study alone.</li> </ol></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jurek Kletsy, post: 225783, member: 40983"] Could you be more specific? Normal physiology being defined as the reference range, is that what you mean? The same range that causes doctors to turn away patients with low T symptoms because they are “within the healthy range”? You want me to provide evidence that the test subjects developed diabetes or cvd? How would that be possible without acces to the data? Fortunately, the burden of proof isn’t placed on those pointing out the limitations of a study, but on the researchers who compiled the data (and those using the study to support their claims). It is, however, a medical fact that diabetes and cvd are diseases that develop slowly in unhealthy individuals. So you can either do 2 things: [LIST=1] [*]Acknowledge that the studies only look at a diagnosis of diabetes and cvd, but don’t look at markers attributing to the development of these diseases, such as, ironically, low testosterone itself. [*]Provide evidence that the study you posted did exactly that and start by providing a link to the full text. I assume didn‘t just base am argument on methodology on the abstract of the study alone. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Latest Bloods. Appreciate Advice.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top