ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Side Effect Management
How potent is old Anastrazole?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wandering81" data-source="post: 147325" data-attributes="member: 38794"><p>It wouldnt be the LEAST bit expensive to test maximum shelf life. Hell, sit a medication on the shelf untouched for years, then test potency. Easy peasy. You just proved my point Dragon. If the government routinely tests the medications they stockpile for effectiveness, and they conclude they are still effective after the expiration date, then why are there still expiration dates on certain medications?? Kinda a catch 22 scare tactic, huh?? Its just a big cycle to keep big pharma churning out product. Cant let a trillion dollar industry sit on its stockpile of meds unused, when there is more money to make producing new medication. So they throw them away for tax deductions. EVERY single little thing in the medical industry is for PROFIT, and profit alone. I can go on and on about the FDA being incorrect in what it tells us we need or dont need. The FDA also tells we dont need a lot of iodine, yet theres enough chlorine, bromine, and flouride in EVERYTHING we eat and drink to displace every atom of iodine in our bodies. With all due respect my friend, I think you put too much faith in the FDA/government. The FDA/government doesnt wants us healthy. You dont find it funny a lot of the politicians own stock in big pharma?? Theres no money to be made when everybodys healthy with their expired medications in their cabinets.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wandering81, post: 147325, member: 38794"] It wouldnt be the LEAST bit expensive to test maximum shelf life. Hell, sit a medication on the shelf untouched for years, then test potency. Easy peasy. You just proved my point Dragon. If the government routinely tests the medications they stockpile for effectiveness, and they conclude they are still effective after the expiration date, then why are there still expiration dates on certain medications?? Kinda a catch 22 scare tactic, huh?? Its just a big cycle to keep big pharma churning out product. Cant let a trillion dollar industry sit on its stockpile of meds unused, when there is more money to make producing new medication. So they throw them away for tax deductions. EVERY single little thing in the medical industry is for PROFIT, and profit alone. I can go on and on about the FDA being incorrect in what it tells us we need or dont need. The FDA also tells we dont need a lot of iodine, yet theres enough chlorine, bromine, and flouride in EVERYTHING we eat and drink to displace every atom of iodine in our bodies. With all due respect my friend, I think you put too much faith in the FDA/government. The FDA/government doesnt wants us healthy. You dont find it funny a lot of the politicians own stock in big pharma?? Theres no money to be made when everybodys healthy with their expired medications in their cabinets. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Side Effect Management
How potent is old Anastrazole?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top