ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Peptide Forums (GHRH, Sermorelin, etc)
General Peptide Use & Information
Higher IGF-1 Predicted Higher Mortality
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MarkLA" data-source="post: 182523" data-attributes="member: 12487"><p>Causality vs. Correlation</p><p></p><p>A year and half ago, I found this video [MEDIA=youtube]3hG2tWvDpVQ[/MEDIA] where Neal Rouzier drives home the difference between Causality and Correlation as relates to E2 management. Basically the gist is that higher E2 is associated with bad health in the study population, but that study population is unhealthy, fat, etc. He's saying that when E2 is high as a result of supplementation -- either through aromatization of T or even from directly supplementing with E2 that it is actually health promoting.</p><p></p><p>So, I apply that thinking to IGF-1 and think maybe only naturally high IGF-1 is a risk factor. Perhaps elevated IGF-1 due to HGH or GHRH analog peptides may be healthful?</p><p></p><p>Thoughts?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MarkLA, post: 182523, member: 12487"] Causality vs. Correlation A year and half ago, I found this video [MEDIA=youtube]3hG2tWvDpVQ[/MEDIA] where Neal Rouzier drives home the difference between Causality and Correlation as relates to E2 management. Basically the gist is that higher E2 is associated with bad health in the study population, but that study population is unhealthy, fat, etc. He's saying that when E2 is high as a result of supplementation -- either through aromatization of T or even from directly supplementing with E2 that it is actually health promoting. So, I apply that thinking to IGF-1 and think maybe only naturally high IGF-1 is a risk factor. Perhaps elevated IGF-1 due to HGH or GHRH analog peptides may be healthful? Thoughts? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Peptide Forums (GHRH, Sermorelin, etc)
General Peptide Use & Information
Higher IGF-1 Predicted Higher Mortality
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top