ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Side Effect Management
High Estradiol in Men: Article that Fueled Hysteria
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DragonBits" data-source="post: 148906" data-attributes="member: 18023"><p>I think it;s more appropriate in general to call LC/MS/MS better for any individual with lower E2 and or with high c-reactive protein.</p><p></p><p>Can anyone explain why <u>women </u>with low E2 and higher c-reactive protein should NOT take the LC/MS/MS version of the test? </p><p></p><p>Also, doesn't it seem a pointless test in those men that contend HIGH E2 is preferable for them, meaning higher than 50, why not take the typical "women's" test? At that point of E2 level, they aren't any different (regarding E2) than women in their Follicular phase 12.5 - 166.0 or Luteal phase 43.8 - 211.0.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Also, it seems little complicated by the reports there is more erroneous variation in LC/MS/MS than in ECLIA testing.</p><p></p><p>But all I am saying, I see both sides have some justification for their position.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DragonBits, post: 148906, member: 18023"] I think it;s more appropriate in general to call LC/MS/MS better for any individual with lower E2 and or with high c-reactive protein. Can anyone explain why [U]women [/U]with low E2 and higher c-reactive protein should NOT take the LC/MS/MS version of the test? Also, doesn't it seem a pointless test in those men that contend HIGH E2 is preferable for them, meaning higher than 50, why not take the typical "women's" test? At that point of E2 level, they aren't any different (regarding E2) than women in their Follicular phase 12.5 - 166.0 or Luteal phase 43.8 - 211.0. Also, it seems little complicated by the reports there is more erroneous variation in LC/MS/MS than in ECLIA testing. But all I am saying, I see both sides have some justification for their position. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Side Effect Management
High Estradiol in Men: Article that Fueled Hysteria
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top