ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Health & Fitness
Nutrition and Supplements
High Dose Vitamin D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DragonBits" data-source="post: 146259" data-attributes="member: 18023"><p>You have supplied copious reasons why you picked blood levels of 30-40 ng/mL for your Vitamin D levels.</p><p></p><p>I never saw any benefit of having higher levels for myself and I have in the past seen studies where it doesn't help with frailty, though I do see lots of recommendations for higher levels </p><p></p><p>Life Extension does concur that 30 ng/ml should be a minimum, but they recommend over 50 ng/ml. While I thought it might not be all that much of a benefit, I also didn't think it was a negative either. Your studies suggest it is a negative. </p><p></p><p>LEF posted a bunch of references at the end of that article.</p><p></p><p>Though their article was from 2010 and the studies you have posted are more recent.</p><p></p><p>================================</p><p></p><p>Based on recent and conclusive published studies, Life Extension®’s new minimum target level for optimal disease prevention is over 50 ng/mL of 25-hydroxyvitamin D</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.lifeextension.com/Magazine/2010/1/Startling-Findings-About-Vitamin-D-Levels-in-Life-Extension-Members/Page-01" target="_blank">Startling Findings About Vitamin D - page 1 | Life Extension</a> </p><p></p><p>I say your lower target of 30-40 seems well supported. good job in explaining it. Thanks</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DragonBits, post: 146259, member: 18023"] You have supplied copious reasons why you picked blood levels of 30-40 ng/mL for your Vitamin D levels. I never saw any benefit of having higher levels for myself and I have in the past seen studies where it doesn't help with frailty, though I do see lots of recommendations for higher levels Life Extension does concur that 30 ng/ml should be a minimum, but they recommend over 50 ng/ml. While I thought it might not be all that much of a benefit, I also didn't think it was a negative either. Your studies suggest it is a negative. LEF posted a bunch of references at the end of that article. Though their article was from 2010 and the studies you have posted are more recent. ================================ Based on recent and conclusive published studies, Life Extension®’s new minimum target level for optimal disease prevention is over 50 ng/mL of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [URL="https://www.lifeextension.com/Magazine/2010/1/Startling-Findings-About-Vitamin-D-Levels-in-Life-Extension-Members/Page-01"]Startling Findings About Vitamin D - page 1 | Life Extension[/URL] I say your lower target of 30-40 seems well supported. good job in explaining it. Thanks [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
General Health & Fitness
Nutrition and Supplements
High Dose Vitamin D
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top