ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Health & Fitness
Health & Wellness
Government Guidelines on Low-fat Diet Were Not Supported by Science
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="croaker24" data-source="post: 23125" data-attributes="member: 900"><p>Healthimpactnews.com????? Look at this:</p><p></p><p><em><strong>We publish articles in this category from the senior editor of Health Impact News, Brian Shilhavy, that look at the ancient cultures in the Bible and how they viewed health. We also feature writers and articles from the Discovery Institute and other places that view science from an Intelligent Design perspective. - See more at: <a href="http://healthimpactnews.com/about-health-impact-news/#sthash.qw7krTpD.dpu" target="_blank">http://healthimpactnews.com/about-health-impact-news/#sthash.qw7krTpD.dpu</a></strong></em>f</p><p></p><p>The same folks pushing anti-science idiocy such as Intelligent Design and we're supposed to take them seriously??? I sure as hell don't think so. </p><p></p><p>You do realize that a low-carb/higher-fat diet could HARM some people who do not have the right genome for such a diet. Consider for example, those with the wrong ApoE genotype - those with e4/e4 or e4/e3 - a higher fat diet could do some damage. The Cleveland Clinic states that statins often does not work well for these people - and a very low-fat diet is sometimes the only choice that they have because their genotype does not allow them to clear out this fat efficiently. I think I'm going to trust the Cleveland Clinic a little more than some Intelligent Design wahoos.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="croaker24, post: 23125, member: 900"] Healthimpactnews.com????? Look at this: [I][B]We publish articles in this category from the senior editor of Health Impact News, Brian Shilhavy, that look at the ancient cultures in the Bible and how they viewed health. We also feature writers and articles from the Discovery Institute and other places that view science from an Intelligent Design perspective. - See more at: [url]http://healthimpactnews.com/about-health-impact-news/#sthash.qw7krTpD.dpu[/url][/B][/I]f The same folks pushing anti-science idiocy such as Intelligent Design and we're supposed to take them seriously??? I sure as hell don't think so. You do realize that a low-carb/higher-fat diet could HARM some people who do not have the right genome for such a diet. Consider for example, those with the wrong ApoE genotype - those with e4/e4 or e4/e3 - a higher fat diet could do some damage. The Cleveland Clinic states that statins often does not work well for these people - and a very low-fat diet is sometimes the only choice that they have because their genotype does not allow them to clear out this fat efficiently. I think I'm going to trust the Cleveland Clinic a little more than some Intelligent Design wahoos. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
General Health & Fitness
Health & Wellness
Government Guidelines on Low-fat Diet Were Not Supported by Science
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top