ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone and Men's Health Articles
F.D.A. Panel Backs Limits on Testosterone Drugs but Rejects Petition for More Regulations
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nelson Vergel" data-source="post: 10946" data-attributes="member: 3"><p>This is a push-back effort that originated from excessive pharmaceutical ads and claims. The two misleading and f<a href="https://www.excelmale.com/forum/showthread.php?1523-ExcelMale-com-Debunks-Misleading-Testosterone-Study" target="_blank">lawed studies</a> did not help either!</p><p></p><p>These comments are definitely going against current data on testosterone replacement. Yes, we need longer term studies (the longest to date is 5 years long), but there is a definite bias in these statements:</p><p></p><p>" Federal health experts said Wednesday there is little evidence that testosterone-boosting drugs are effective for treating common signs of aging in men and that their use should be narrowed to exclude millions of Americans currently taking them.</p><p></p><p>The panel of Food and Drug Administration advisers voted<strong> 20-1 that prescribing language on blockbuster testosterone treatments should be revised to make clear they have not been shown to reverse common aging issues like low libido, fatigue and muscle loss. </strong>The labeling change would drastically limit the drugs' FDA-approved indication to men who have abnormally low hormone levels due to disease or injury, instead of aging."</p><p></p><p>Comments anyone?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nelson Vergel, post: 10946, member: 3"] This is a push-back effort that originated from excessive pharmaceutical ads and claims. The two misleading and f[URL="https://www.excelmale.com/forum/showthread.php?1523-ExcelMale-com-Debunks-Misleading-Testosterone-Study"]lawed studies[/URL] did not help either! These comments are definitely going against current data on testosterone replacement. Yes, we need longer term studies (the longest to date is 5 years long), but there is a definite bias in these statements: " Federal health experts said Wednesday there is little evidence that testosterone-boosting drugs are effective for treating common signs of aging in men and that their use should be narrowed to exclude millions of Americans currently taking them. The panel of Food and Drug Administration advisers voted[B] 20-1 that prescribing language on blockbuster testosterone treatments should be revised to make clear they have not been shown to reverse common aging issues like low libido, fatigue and muscle loss. [/B]The labeling change would drastically limit the drugs' FDA-approved indication to men who have abnormally low hormone levels due to disease or injury, instead of aging." Comments anyone? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone and Men's Health Articles
F.D.A. Panel Backs Limits on Testosterone Drugs but Rejects Petition for More Regulations
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top