ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Estrogen is Essential for Muscle Growth in Bodybuilders
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="benaoao" data-source="post: 184209" data-attributes="member: 40482"><p>Yes every study that disagrees with the bias is poorly designed and every study that doesn’t is the gold standard. Clearly a 6 weeker of Deca is ideal, groups of 7-8 subjects is ideal, but let’s take their work at face value. I will remind you both that I jumped in saying Nandrolone increases glucose transport and insulin sensitivity. High E2 isn’t needed for that. That high E2 propaganda comes from Neal Rouzier being incapable of converting pmol/L into pg/mL, it is actually embarrassing for him when watching his TOT videos again.</p><p></p><p>from the same Authors:<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/20502392_The_Administration_of_Pharmacological_Doses_of_Testosterone_or_19-Nortestosterone_to_Normal_Men_is_Not_Associated_with_Increased_Insulin_Secretion_or_Impaired_Glucose_Tolerance" target="_blank">(PDF) The Administration of Pharmacological Doses of Testosterone or 19-Nortestosterone to Normal Men is Not Associated with Increased Insulin Secretion or Impaired Glucose Tolerance*</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So, science speaks for itself. This isn’t about me, contrary to what simple minds would think. I’m solely being objective about a drug that is dissed a lot among “test is best” bros. I thought this forum is to discuss “clinical use of anabolics”? I’m not talking nandrolone anywhere else on excel male.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Further, what I think is interesting is how Deca 100 obliterates T 100. This would be in line with Taeian Clarke’s views that past a certain point (which is reached on as little as 100 mg/wk of nandrolone seemingly) you don’t really get that much more anabolism (muscle androgen receptors saturated) but you’d get more fat burning (and water bloating from all that E2). So in that sense DHT is superior to DHN.</p><p></p><p>So it comes down to being marginally bigger and stronger at the cost of all the side effects. But that is NOT “clinical use of anabolics” anymore and I don’t care about body dysmorphic individuals.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="benaoao, post: 184209, member: 40482"] Yes every study that disagrees with the bias is poorly designed and every study that doesn’t is the gold standard. Clearly a 6 weeker of Deca is ideal, groups of 7-8 subjects is ideal, but let’s take their work at face value. I will remind you both that I jumped in saying Nandrolone increases glucose transport and insulin sensitivity. High E2 isn’t needed for that. That high E2 propaganda comes from Neal Rouzier being incapable of converting pmol/L into pg/mL, it is actually embarrassing for him when watching his TOT videos again. from the same Authors:[URL='https://www.researchgate.net/publication/20502392_The_Administration_of_Pharmacological_Doses_of_Testosterone_or_19-Nortestosterone_to_Normal_Men_is_Not_Associated_with_Increased_Insulin_Secretion_or_Impaired_Glucose_Tolerance'](PDF) The Administration of Pharmacological Doses of Testosterone or 19-Nortestosterone to Normal Men is Not Associated with Increased Insulin Secretion or Impaired Glucose Tolerance*[/URL] So, science speaks for itself. This isn’t about me, contrary to what simple minds would think. I’m solely being objective about a drug that is dissed a lot among “test is best” bros. I thought this forum is to discuss “clinical use of anabolics”? I’m not talking nandrolone anywhere else on excel male. Further, what I think is interesting is how Deca 100 obliterates T 100. This would be in line with Taeian Clarke’s views that past a certain point (which is reached on as little as 100 mg/wk of nandrolone seemingly) you don’t really get that much more anabolism (muscle androgen receptors saturated) but you’d get more fat burning (and water bloating from all that E2). So in that sense DHT is superior to DHN. So it comes down to being marginally bigger and stronger at the cost of all the side effects. But that is NOT “clinical use of anabolics” anymore and I don’t care about body dysmorphic individuals. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Estrogen is Essential for Muscle Growth in Bodybuilders
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top