ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Does TRT reverse/improve sexual symptoms for most men with High Range SHBG / Lower Free T?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tareload" data-source="post: 223709"><p>I shared the plot with ref ranges for major reference labs in US (first 4 bars). Here it is again:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]21717[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p></p><p>Tru-T way over (>=40%) a large fraction of both Labcorp and Quest LC/MS-MS+ED measurements that I have come across and also in the peer reviewed literature. Plenty of discussion and comparisons on here. Vermeulen typically 0 to 20% higher than fT with ED. Make your own conclusions. I will stick with fT ref range of 5 to 25 ng/dl (ARUP, they seem like a decent pick) till I read the standardization work is complete. Maybe then we will know if tru-T truly is superior or inferior to cfTV. Currently something is <em>very very</em> wrong in the wonderful world of fT.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tareload, post: 223709"] I shared the plot with ref ranges for major reference labs in US (first 4 bars). Here it is again: [ATTACH type="full" alt="1652319555492.png"]21717[/ATTACH] Tru-T way over (>=40%) a large fraction of both Labcorp and Quest LC/MS-MS+ED measurements that I have come across and also in the peer reviewed literature. Plenty of discussion and comparisons on here. Vermeulen typically 0 to 20% higher than fT with ED. Make your own conclusions. I will stick with fT ref range of 5 to 25 ng/dl (ARUP, they seem like a decent pick) till I read the standardization work is complete. Maybe then we will know if tru-T truly is superior or inferior to cfTV. Currently something is [I]very very[/I] wrong in the wonderful world of fT. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Does TRT reverse/improve sexual symptoms for most men with High Range SHBG / Lower Free T?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top