ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Health & Fitness
Health & Wellness
Did the Coronavirus Originate in the US?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cataceous" data-source="post: 174601" data-attributes="member: 38109"><p>This is mainly a broad evasion of the specific issue. There's a peer-reviewed article presenting evidence that this virus does not appear to have been manipulated. Instead of refuting it with evidence you want to vaguely argue that mysterious entities may be unhappy with certain publication results and may have the power to quash them. The mere possibility of such entities means that "no answer can be trusted." You should know that in publishing his work, no good scientist is going to give an answer and say "Trust me." Instead, he lays out all the information and says "We think this means X and we welcome attempts by others to reproduce this work and either provide further support for our conclusions or refute them."</p><p></p><p>Regarding politicization, à la climate change, are you suggesting it's already occurred, such that the most published experts in this field will look the other way if there is evidence of human involvement in this virus? Or is it suddenly taking place now, with all these scientists being threatened, yet quite dubiously not one has rebelled and made the pressure public?</p><p></p><p>In the end these are pretty outlandish suggestions, able to survive only because it's difficult to prove a negative. Someone says you robbed a bank in the last 10 years. Prove you didn't.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cataceous, post: 174601, member: 38109"] This is mainly a broad evasion of the specific issue. There's a peer-reviewed article presenting evidence that this virus does not appear to have been manipulated. Instead of refuting it with evidence you want to vaguely argue that mysterious entities may be unhappy with certain publication results and may have the power to quash them. The mere possibility of such entities means that "no answer can be trusted." You should know that in publishing his work, no good scientist is going to give an answer and say "Trust me." Instead, he lays out all the information and says "We think this means X and we welcome attempts by others to reproduce this work and either provide further support for our conclusions or refute them." Regarding politicization, à la climate change, are you suggesting it's already occurred, such that the most published experts in this field will look the other way if there is evidence of human involvement in this virus? Or is it suddenly taking place now, with all these scientists being threatened, yet quite dubiously not one has rebelled and made the pressure public? In the end these are pretty outlandish suggestions, able to survive only because it's difficult to prove a negative. Someone says you robbed a bank in the last 10 years. Prove you didn't. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
General Health & Fitness
Health & Wellness
Did the Coronavirus Originate in the US?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top