Eaxctly, my point 
The statement 'the studies say so, so your opinion contradicting them is wrong' is very sulerficial, people should understand how little of the whole picture the studies show us, how limited they are.
Also I argued above how such study should be designed and how it seems worthless to me designing it in unrealistic in the real world scenario.
I think the best doctors do the best that can be done with the science we have: They know the studies, but they also have the ANECDOTAL SUBJECTIVe experience of a lot of patients. And based on that for example my provider says: 'I think its better you start TRT on IM, like this you have highest chance to resolve your symptoms'(he also encourages people to use IM). Or about thyroid he says: "In my experience most people react best to NDT, so you can try first that". And unlike me he continues reading studies regularly because this is his job, Ive personally stopped investing time in that and I pay him to manage me.
And at the end he doesnt know for sure what will work for me before tryibg, and he says he still is not sure why only sustanon works for me, I'm the first like that in his practice and normally he is not a fan of sustanon
