ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Daily Intramuscular injections.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="madman" data-source="post: 207257" data-attributes="member: 13851"><p>This is classic!</p><p></p><p>It's hilarious that on my first reply in <strong><em>post #7 of your thread from (April 24)</em> </strong>you were all fine and dandy 12 weeks in on a strictly-sub-q protocol.....then all of a sudden your numbers dropped and now sub-q is bad for you or anyone one considering let alone on trt.....LMFAO..... you clearly stated.....<strong><em>and in the <u>first 3 months everything was great, UNTIL I stopped absorbing sub-q and my levels fell significantly in a matter of weeks on the same dose without a protocol change</u>? I think this was the first pitfall.</em></strong></p><p></p><p>Could have stopped right here as you clearly burned yourself.....<strong><em><u>first 3 months everything was great</u>, UNTIL I stopped absorbing sub-q</em></strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is coming from the F**KING guy spewing this bullshit!</p><p></p><p><strong><em>*there is a <u>very high chance someone starting TRT for the first time on sub q wont be able to experience FEELING enough of the effects of therapy</u> so I would strongly advise anyone against that.</em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em>* sub-q is inferior to IM</em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em>*<strong><em>absorption/effectiveness of SUB-Q is subpar compared to IM injections</em></strong></em></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="madman, post: 207257, member: 13851"] This is classic! It's hilarious that on my first reply in [B][I]post #7 of your thread from (April 24)[/I] [/B]you were all fine and dandy 12 weeks in on a strictly-sub-q protocol.....then all of a sudden your numbers dropped and now sub-q is bad for you or anyone one considering let alone on trt.....LMFAO..... you clearly stated.....[B][I]and in the [U]first 3 months everything was great, UNTIL I stopped absorbing sub-q and my levels fell significantly in a matter of weeks on the same dose without a protocol change[/U]? I think this was the first pitfall.[/I][/B] Could have stopped right here as you clearly burned yourself.....[B][I][U]first 3 months everything was great[/U], UNTIL I stopped absorbing sub-q[/I][/B] This is coming from the F**KING guy spewing this bullshit! [B][I]*there is a [U]very high chance someone starting TRT for the first time on sub q wont be able to experience FEELING enough of the effects of therapy[/U] so I would strongly advise anyone against that. * sub-q is inferior to IM *[B][I]absorption/effectiveness of SUB-Q is subpar compared to IM injections[/I][/B][/I][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Daily Intramuscular injections.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top