ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Health & Fitness
Health & Wellness
Cholesterol Lowering: Crestor vs Niacin
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gman86" data-source="post: 179410" data-attributes="member: 15043"><p>Very well said! What u explained is basically exactly why I’m hesitant to go full carnivore at the moment. I just think to put on more lean muscle tissue, it will be a lot easier, and cheaper financially, to do it with a moderate amount of carbs. But in the end, health and longevity trump having more muscle mass than my genetics probably intended. So I see myself eventually going full carnivore. </p><p></p><p>The only thing that u may have gotten wrong is the muscle glycogen thing. I’m not 100% sure u did, so don’t hold me to it, but there’s this guy dr Paul saladino. Other than Shawn baker, he’s one of the leading doctors in the carnivore movement. Imo, he’s the best source of information on carnivore. Guys a robot. Have no clue how he retains all the knowledge that he does, and can express it so intelligently. But anyways, he’s said that in studies that he’s read, they have shown that muscle glycogen stores were no different when comparing athletes using carbs, and carnivore/ fat adapted athletes. Again, I personally haven’t read the studies, but have heard Dr Paul saladino quote this study on multiple occasions. Not sure if it’s been replicated, or even true. Just something to consider. But I’m with u. To maintain the amount of muscle mass that ur body prefers, and get down to the body fat percentage that makes u look lean, while maintaining optimal health, carnivore is king. It’s the only diet I’ve seen people consistently maintain muscle and lose body fat without having to track any type of macros. It’s like losing weight for dummies. Diet couldn’t be any simpler to stick to, cravings completely go away, ur relationship with food becomes much healthier and how it should be, and u don’t have to track any calories (in most people) to get the body u desire. My cravings have completely gone away, and my relationship with food is at a place I never thought it would be, and I’m still doing 150g of healthy sources of carbs per day. I would think I would have even less cravings on full carnivore.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gman86, post: 179410, member: 15043"] Very well said! What u explained is basically exactly why I’m hesitant to go full carnivore at the moment. I just think to put on more lean muscle tissue, it will be a lot easier, and cheaper financially, to do it with a moderate amount of carbs. But in the end, health and longevity trump having more muscle mass than my genetics probably intended. So I see myself eventually going full carnivore. The only thing that u may have gotten wrong is the muscle glycogen thing. I’m not 100% sure u did, so don’t hold me to it, but there’s this guy dr Paul saladino. Other than Shawn baker, he’s one of the leading doctors in the carnivore movement. Imo, he’s the best source of information on carnivore. Guys a robot. Have no clue how he retains all the knowledge that he does, and can express it so intelligently. But anyways, he’s said that in studies that he’s read, they have shown that muscle glycogen stores were no different when comparing athletes using carbs, and carnivore/ fat adapted athletes. Again, I personally haven’t read the studies, but have heard Dr Paul saladino quote this study on multiple occasions. Not sure if it’s been replicated, or even true. Just something to consider. But I’m with u. To maintain the amount of muscle mass that ur body prefers, and get down to the body fat percentage that makes u look lean, while maintaining optimal health, carnivore is king. It’s the only diet I’ve seen people consistently maintain muscle and lose body fat without having to track any type of macros. It’s like losing weight for dummies. Diet couldn’t be any simpler to stick to, cravings completely go away, ur relationship with food becomes much healthier and how it should be, and u don’t have to track any calories (in most people) to get the body u desire. My cravings have completely gone away, and my relationship with food is at a place I never thought it would be, and I’m still doing 150g of healthy sources of carbs per day. I would think I would have even less cravings on full carnivore. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
General Health & Fitness
Health & Wellness
Cholesterol Lowering: Crestor vs Niacin
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top