ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Health & Fitness
Health & Wellness
Chemical found in common sweetener damages DNA
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sammmy" data-source="post: 255398" data-attributes="member: 38594"><p>Obviously biased research: they did bunch of tests measuring "proxies", "markers", and "indicators", yet both sucralose and its metabolite turned out non-mutagenic in the actual mutagenicity test with bacterial cells, and that contradiction is completely omitted in the discussion section.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The influence of sucralose and its metabolite on intestinal permeability was tested in an artificial layer of thickness of 1 cell!!! Not convincing ...</p><p></p><p>The studies of this and that gene getting activated by sucralose are hilarious - contemporary medicine has no complete understanding of genetics and can't predict what can or will happen just by looking at gene activation.</p><p></p><p>The style of the whole article can be summarized as "sucralose is very, VERY bad, and other people are saying it, so it must be true, but we can't prove it with a direct test, so we will skip that in the conclusion".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sammmy, post: 255398, member: 38594"] Obviously biased research: they did bunch of tests measuring "proxies", "markers", and "indicators", yet both sucralose and its metabolite turned out non-mutagenic in the actual mutagenicity test with bacterial cells, and that contradiction is completely omitted in the discussion section. The influence of sucralose and its metabolite on intestinal permeability was tested in an artificial layer of thickness of 1 cell!!! Not convincing ... The studies of this and that gene getting activated by sucralose are hilarious - contemporary medicine has no complete understanding of genetics and can't predict what can or will happen just by looking at gene activation. The style of the whole article can be summarized as "sucralose is very, VERY bad, and other people are saying it, so it must be true, but we can't prove it with a direct test, so we will skip that in the conclusion". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
General Health & Fitness
Health & Wellness
Chemical found in common sweetener damages DNA
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top