ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
When Testosterone Is Not Enough
Are Surgeries to Fix Erectile Dysfunction Effective?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="madman" data-source="post: 186253" data-attributes="member: 13851"><p><strong>Abstract:</strong> Penile erection implicates arterial inflow, sinusoidal relaxation, and corporoveno-occlusive function. By far the most widely recognized vascular etiologies responsible for organic erectile dysfunction can be divided into arterial insufficiency, corporoveno-occlusive dysfunction, or mixed type, with corporoveno-occlusive dysfunction representing the most common finding. In arteriogenic erectile dysfunction, corpora cavernosa shows lower oxygen tension, leading to a diminished volume of cavernosal smooth muscle and consequential corporoveno-occlusive dysfunction. Current studies support the contention that corporoveno-occlusive dysfunction is an effect rather than the cause of erectile dysfunction. Surgical interventions have consisted primarily of penile revascularization surgery for arterial insufficiency and penile venous surgery for corporoveno-occlusive dysfunction, whatever the mechanism. However, the surgical effectiveness remained debatable and unproven, mostly owing to the lack of consistent hemodynamic assessment, standardized select patient and validated outcome measures, as well as various surgical procedures. Penile vascular surgery has been disclaimed to be the treatment of choice based on the currently available guidelines. However, reports on penile revascularization surgery support its utility in treating arterial insufficiency in otherwise healthy patients aged <55 years with erectile dysfunction of late attributable to the arterial occlusive disease. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that penile venous surgery might be beneficial for selected patients with corporoveno-occlusive dysfunction, especially with a better understanding of the innovative venous anatomy of the penis. Penile vascular surgery might remain a viable alternative for the treatment of erectile dysfunction and could have found its niche in the possibility of obtaining spontaneous, unaided, and natural erection.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Critical guideline issued In 2015, the panel in the fourth Paris International Consultation on Sexual Medicine concluded that venous surgery or embolization is not recommended for the treatment of CVOD; regardless, the procedures can be carried out under the circumstances of clinical research with informed consent, standardized methods of diagnosis and surgical treatment. Standardized questionnaires (IIEF) and long-term (a minimum of 24 months) follow up are also required (LOE = 4; strength of recommendation = C; option).33 In 2018, the American Urological Association Guidelines Panel proclaimed that penile venous surgery is not recommended for patients with ED (moderate recommendation; evidence level: grade C).91 The European Association of Urology guidelines on ED, premature ejaculation, penile curvature, and priapism also disclaimed penile venous surgery to be an option for management of ED.92</p><p></p><p><strong>Conclusions </strong></p><p></p><p><em><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">Nowadays, there is no convincing evidence available to draw conclusions that supplant these guidelines recommended by the panels on ED. Numerous physicians query whether or not penile vascular surgery addresses the underlying pathology.</span></em> <em><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">Sarcastically, the same concern should apply to current options recommended in the guidelines.</span></em> <strong><em><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">Integration or combination of vascular surgery into goal-approached therapies, which include psychological counseling, medical (e.g. phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor and intracavernosal injection), non-surgical (e.g. vacuum device and low-intensity shock wave therapy), and alternative surgical intervention (e.g. penile prosthesis), would optimize patient-centered management strategies.</span></em></strong> <em><strong><span style="color: rgb(44, 130, 201)">It is noteworthy that penile venous surgery might be beneficial to selected patients with CVOD, especially with a better understanding of the innovative venous anatomy of the penis. To afford opportunities for the improvement of ED, penile vascular surgery remains a viable option and has found its niche in the possibility of obtaining spontaneous, unaided, and natural erection. </span></strong></em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="madman, post: 186253, member: 13851"] [B]Abstract:[/B] Penile erection implicates arterial inflow, sinusoidal relaxation, and corporoveno-occlusive function. By far the most widely recognized vascular etiologies responsible for organic erectile dysfunction can be divided into arterial insufficiency, corporoveno-occlusive dysfunction, or mixed type, with corporoveno-occlusive dysfunction representing the most common finding. In arteriogenic erectile dysfunction, corpora cavernosa shows lower oxygen tension, leading to a diminished volume of cavernosal smooth muscle and consequential corporoveno-occlusive dysfunction. Current studies support the contention that corporoveno-occlusive dysfunction is an effect rather than the cause of erectile dysfunction. Surgical interventions have consisted primarily of penile revascularization surgery for arterial insufficiency and penile venous surgery for corporoveno-occlusive dysfunction, whatever the mechanism. However, the surgical effectiveness remained debatable and unproven, mostly owing to the lack of consistent hemodynamic assessment, standardized select patient and validated outcome measures, as well as various surgical procedures. Penile vascular surgery has been disclaimed to be the treatment of choice based on the currently available guidelines. However, reports on penile revascularization surgery support its utility in treating arterial insufficiency in otherwise healthy patients aged <55 years with erectile dysfunction of late attributable to the arterial occlusive disease. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that penile venous surgery might be beneficial for selected patients with corporoveno-occlusive dysfunction, especially with a better understanding of the innovative venous anatomy of the penis. Penile vascular surgery might remain a viable alternative for the treatment of erectile dysfunction and could have found its niche in the possibility of obtaining spontaneous, unaided, and natural erection. Critical guideline issued In 2015, the panel in the fourth Paris International Consultation on Sexual Medicine concluded that venous surgery or embolization is not recommended for the treatment of CVOD; regardless, the procedures can be carried out under the circumstances of clinical research with informed consent, standardized methods of diagnosis and surgical treatment. Standardized questionnaires (IIEF) and long-term (a minimum of 24 months) follow up are also required (LOE = 4; strength of recommendation = C; option).33 In 2018, the American Urological Association Guidelines Panel proclaimed that penile venous surgery is not recommended for patients with ED (moderate recommendation; evidence level: grade C).91 The European Association of Urology guidelines on ED, premature ejaculation, penile curvature, and priapism also disclaimed penile venous surgery to be an option for management of ED.92 [B]Conclusions [/B] [I][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]Nowadays, there is no convincing evidence available to draw conclusions that supplant these guidelines recommended by the panels on ED. Numerous physicians query whether or not penile vascular surgery addresses the underlying pathology.[/COLOR][/I] [I][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]Sarcastically, the same concern should apply to current options recommended in the guidelines.[/COLOR][/I] [B][I][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]Integration or combination of vascular surgery into goal-approached therapies, which include psychological counseling, medical (e.g. phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor and intracavernosal injection), non-surgical (e.g. vacuum device and low-intensity shock wave therapy), and alternative surgical intervention (e.g. penile prosthesis), would optimize patient-centered management strategies.[/COLOR][/I][/B] [I][B][COLOR=rgb(44, 130, 201)]It is noteworthy that penile venous surgery might be beneficial to selected patients with CVOD, especially with a better understanding of the innovative venous anatomy of the penis. To afford opportunities for the improvement of ED, penile vascular surgery remains a viable option and has found its niche in the possibility of obtaining spontaneous, unaided, and natural erection. [/COLOR][/B][/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
When Testosterone Is Not Enough
Are Surgeries to Fix Erectile Dysfunction Effective?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top