ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Any concerns about long term anastrozole use in men?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tmaxey1" data-source="post: 268659" data-attributes="member: 38311"><p>It seems that the argument against controlling estrogen is usually living in the extremes. Saying men need estrogen. Its missing the point of the men who believe in controlling it. Controlling it doesnt mean eliminating it. People like to point to studies that show harm from low estrogen levels. The pro estrogen control side are not pro low estrogen levels. They are anti high estrogen levels. </p><p></p><p>Are their actually and studies or reasons that an estrogen level of 60 is more beneficial than a level of 30? No one is advocating for estrogen levels of 5. This seems to be the place the anti AI crowd keep framing their argument from. </p><p></p><p>The posted article about sexual function and estrogen levels actually pointed out that the flaw in the data is typically the men with the higher estrogen levels also had much higher test levels. This doesnt do anything to point to a managed in range estrogen level is harmful. If I don't take an AI my estrogen will run high. 60-70 range. I feel better physically, blood pressure is better, and sexual health is better in the 30 range.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tmaxey1, post: 268659, member: 38311"] It seems that the argument against controlling estrogen is usually living in the extremes. Saying men need estrogen. Its missing the point of the men who believe in controlling it. Controlling it doesnt mean eliminating it. People like to point to studies that show harm from low estrogen levels. The pro estrogen control side are not pro low estrogen levels. They are anti high estrogen levels. Are their actually and studies or reasons that an estrogen level of 60 is more beneficial than a level of 30? No one is advocating for estrogen levels of 5. This seems to be the place the anti AI crowd keep framing their argument from. The posted article about sexual function and estrogen levels actually pointed out that the flaw in the data is typically the men with the higher estrogen levels also had much higher test levels. This doesnt do anything to point to a managed in range estrogen level is harmful. If I don't take an AI my estrogen will run high. 60-70 range. I feel better physically, blood pressure is better, and sexual health is better in the 30 range. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Any concerns about long term anastrozole use in men?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top