ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone and Men's Health Articles
Antares Pharma Reports on Their Study Using Testosterone Subcutaneous Injections
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eli1947" data-source="post: 25036" data-attributes="member: 407"><p>Nelson, joining torrential with thanks for following and reporting. </p><p>In the past I used the SC method but due to large reactions developed initiating at the spots of injections I stopped using the SC method. (The study report a reaction defined as ecchymosis but I am not sure is the same). </p><p>Just going over the results I would like to mention one point: we must remember that the study has a goal, to support marketing authorisation of the new treatment based on sc of about 100 mg/w . And that some of the science we would be happy to know about the differences between SC and IM are missing or washed in the means and SD of data as reported. If both treatments were the same they would have designed the study differently to show same dose PK in comparisons. Just to mention that IM TE has Tmax much greater than 24h.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eli1947, post: 25036, member: 407"] Nelson, joining torrential with thanks for following and reporting. In the past I used the SC method but due to large reactions developed initiating at the spots of injections I stopped using the SC method. (The study report a reaction defined as ecchymosis but I am not sure is the same). Just going over the results I would like to mention one point: we must remember that the study has a goal, to support marketing authorisation of the new treatment based on sc of about 100 mg/w . And that some of the science we would be happy to know about the differences between SC and IM are missing or washed in the means and SD of data as reported. If both treatments were the same they would have designed the study differently to show same dose PK in comparisons. Just to mention that IM TE has Tmax much greater than 24h. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone and Men's Health Articles
Antares Pharma Reports on Their Study Using Testosterone Subcutaneous Injections
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top