ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
35% Drop in serum Total T in 6 months with no protocol change. Why???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="madman" data-source="post: 214116" data-attributes="member: 13851"><p>Again!</p><p></p><p>Might wanna try asking someone<strong> (the OP/strongercards)</strong> to post a full set of labs (assays/reference ranges, lab used) let alone make sure when it comes to comparing blood work whether one is following a strictly sub-q protocol, strictly IM protocol let alone sub-q vs IM protocol that they are following the steps needed in order to make a fair comparison before shooting off at the mouth stating....<strong><em><u>Excellent chance</u> its the <u>SUBQ</u> resulting in lower levels over time</em></strong></p><p></p><p>Who said that there is anything wrong with someone trying IM?</p><p></p><p>The sad fact of the matter is you clearly stated.....<strong><em>Excellent chance its the SUBQ resulting in lower levels over time</em></strong></p><p></p><p>First thing flapping out your gums.</p><p></p><p>Give your head a shake.</p><p></p><p>OP never had an issue years in on a strictly sub-q protocol yet you pop your mug on the thread as you have done on numerous other threads pushing that it's the sub-q resulting in the lower levels bulls**t.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="madman, post: 214116, member: 13851"] Again! Might wanna try asking someone[B] (the OP/strongercards)[/B] to post a full set of labs (assays/reference ranges, lab used) let alone make sure when it comes to comparing blood work whether one is following a strictly sub-q protocol, strictly IM protocol let alone sub-q vs IM protocol that they are following the steps needed in order to make a fair comparison before shooting off at the mouth stating....[B][I][U]Excellent chance[/U] its the [U]SUBQ[/U] resulting in lower levels over time[/I][/B] Who said that there is anything wrong with someone trying IM? The sad fact of the matter is you clearly stated.....[B][I]Excellent chance its the SUBQ resulting in lower levels over time[/I][/B] First thing flapping out your gums. Give your head a shake. OP never had an issue years in on a strictly sub-q protocol yet you pop your mug on the thread as you have done on numerous other threads pushing that it's the sub-q resulting in the lower levels bulls**t. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
35% Drop in serum Total T in 6 months with no protocol change. Why???
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top