ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
“High-Normal T”
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JRos895" data-source="post: 249295" data-attributes="member: 43163"><p>I’m not sure this point sums it up—if anything it goes against what I was trying to say because they endorse the “high-normal” theory because they claim that 800-950 is generally the best place for testosterone levels. </p><p></p><p>I agree that a level of 265 (or 365 for that matter) should probably treated when a man is symptomatic. But why is 916 any better than 265? Who says that it’s better and healthier to have high normal testosterone levels relative to low normal testosterone levels? The prolactin range is generally 3-20 (I forget the units)—does anybody ever aim for a prolactin of 20 just because it is “high-normal”?</p><p></p><p>I honestly think statements like the above epitomize many clinics desire to cater to certain mens’ desire to have a high testosterone level, and not necessarily to help them achieve full symptom relief.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JRos895, post: 249295, member: 43163"] I’m not sure this point sums it up—if anything it goes against what I was trying to say because they endorse the “high-normal” theory because they claim that 800-950 is generally the best place for testosterone levels. I agree that a level of 265 (or 365 for that matter) should probably treated when a man is symptomatic. But why is 916 any better than 265? Who says that it’s better and healthier to have high normal testosterone levels relative to low normal testosterone levels? The prolactin range is generally 3-20 (I forget the units)—does anybody ever aim for a prolactin of 20 just because it is “high-normal”? I honestly think statements like the above epitomize many clinics desire to cater to certain mens’ desire to have a high testosterone level, and not necessarily to help them achieve full symptom relief. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
“High-Normal T”
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top