Cialis alternatives and potency / dosing opinions please

Gents, anyone with experience having taken prescription Cialis transitioned to more cost effective alternatives such as reputable domestic peptide companies tadalafil suspensions or foreign made tablets such as Ceebis have any thoughts on dosage strengths compared to the prescription offering of brand name Cialis?

I took prescription Cialis for awhile and became pretty well associated with the various side effects versus potency results before I got to the point where the sides more or less went away except for a slight stuffy nose or mild indigestion when taking a large dosage.

I am left wondering after taking liquid tadalafil in 30mg per ml formulations and trying 20mg Ceebis tablets if there's some substantial buffering in the original prescription formulation that allows more of the tadalafil to make it to the glucose stream versus peptides and foreign made tabs?

I don't doubt the makers of the alternative products for stated mg content but it sure seems they require much higher dosing levels to get the same repeatable results as brand name Cialis, I wonder of the GI tract is able to destroy some of the tadalafil contained in these products easier versus branded Cialis?

For the liquid peptides I've tried holding it under the tongue versus just swallowing it down and that doesn't seem to make any noticeable difference. For what it's worth I have come to believe daily tadalafil is the fountain of youth for a broad range of positive health and lifestyle improvements.

Is it just me or anyone else seem to notice a distinct difference?

I think the overseas products have been subjected to due scrutiny for potency, I've experienced it, I think. Potency from one pill to the next in the pack it seems. Some have stated that cutting a 20 in half, has yielded different results from each halve. That led to speculation that the active ingredient wasn't uniform through the tablet. I think in the end the cost and ease of obtaining it has a very viable road for most of us that taking 20mg to get a solid 10mg of action is worth it.
When it comes to the research chems, I get varying responses. As a daily the back pain sides got me quickly to a point of not liking it, Tadalafil. I still use it though.
Ffor expected need I just take 20mg, of either the Chem or the overseas variant and things are reasonably fine for me.
Otherwise the cost covered with my insurance refuses coverage of any of the big the PDE5i's, make these worthwhile alternatives.

Interesting Vince, thanks for the input and I agree the pills from overseas seem to be less effective per stated dose versus the patent oval shaped gold bars in an equivalent. Never even considered that splitting a pill might impact effectiveness, although most of whatever is in that pill has to be something other than tadalafil as it's volume would be next to nothing.

For what it's worth, I just repurchased a large quantity of liquid Tadalafil from a domestic peptide supplier and having numerous new bottles of it you can clearly see the powder that separates laying in the bottom of all of the bottles side by side and they sure look very consistent for content.

I had bad back and hip pain at first when I increased the daily dosage to get where I wanted to be with it but that has totally subsided now, I think the increase of NO in the system has a lot to do with that and there's an adjustment period to it that passes.

~I haven't had this much energy and an overall feeling of well being in years, the overall impact of adding this to a daily health regimen is absolutely amazing.

Couldn't agree more that the cost and ease of obtaining alternatives is hands down a winner no matter where you get it, even with increased consumption rates above clinical prescription doses it comes out in the wash to be significantly less costly, like an entire year's supply costing what you'd pay for one month of Cialis.

ON the research chem side, I've seen two different formulations, one is thin like water and the other is a much thicker, more viscous formulation. I was told something like poly...PEG...something like that as the difference in the two, I prefer the watery formula. With either shaking vigorously for 5-10 seconds seem to be required even if you see no settling at the bottom.

I have also noticed you really need to put some work into shaking the liquid Tadalafil as well every time it's dosed, 15 seconds seem like an assault on the little bottle but you wind up with the last 1/3rd in a very weak concentration otherwise if you don't just a quick back and forth doesn't cut it.

Where did the watery formula come from? I don't care for the thick stuff.