ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
TRT to Supraphysiological Levels for Body Building
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dicky" data-source="post: 215843" data-attributes="member: 42549"><p>These studies are interesting and can def serve as a warning to potential users. What I dislike about these types of studies is that they usually say something like "AAS use/abuse is associated with (some adverse impact here)". To me it is super annoying that scientific articles are written about this subject, with no quantification of dosages involved. </p><p></p><p>Most of the studies I have seen never tell you that the test subjects took XX amount of YY substances. No, instead they just say AAS use or abuse. So sure, somebody taking a gram of Test C with 1/2 gram of nandrolone can expect to see some adverse impacts. But is this really the same as a dude taking 75mg of Test C weekly? I would think not. But nevertheless, they both fall into the AAS user/abuser category. BTW what is AAS abuse anyway? Have any of these studies defined it? </p><p></p><p>Sorry for the rant but it chaps my buns to see a study tell me that test subjects ejection fraction declined by 5.386% (to pull a precise number from my hat) from AAS abuse without defining the doses involved. This always strikes me that the authors are trying to use the study as a scare tactic instead of getting at the truth. </p><p></p><p>BTW, this criticism is in no way directed at [USER=38590]@readalot[/USER]. I always appreciate his perspective and hard-earned knowledge.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dicky, post: 215843, member: 42549"] These studies are interesting and can def serve as a warning to potential users. What I dislike about these types of studies is that they usually say something like "AAS use/abuse is associated with (some adverse impact here)". To me it is super annoying that scientific articles are written about this subject, with no quantification of dosages involved. Most of the studies I have seen never tell you that the test subjects took XX amount of YY substances. No, instead they just say AAS use or abuse. So sure, somebody taking a gram of Test C with 1/2 gram of nandrolone can expect to see some adverse impacts. But is this really the same as a dude taking 75mg of Test C weekly? I would think not. But nevertheless, they both fall into the AAS user/abuser category. BTW what is AAS abuse anyway? Have any of these studies defined it? Sorry for the rant but it chaps my buns to see a study tell me that test subjects ejection fraction declined by 5.386% (to pull a precise number from my hat) from AAS abuse without defining the doses involved. This always strikes me that the authors are trying to use the study as a scare tactic instead of getting at the truth. BTW, this criticism is in no way directed at [USER=38590]@readalot[/USER]. I always appreciate his perspective and hard-earned knowledge. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
TRT to Supraphysiological Levels for Body Building
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top