ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Natesto: large shards UPDATE- batch is all bad.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="granger" data-source="post: 277216" data-attributes="member: 45577"><p>agreed, concern is mostly hitting crystals and getting TOO high of test levels and random dosages which of course may impact HPTA aXIS alot more than standard dosing. because you cannot OD its not a big deal to public safety HOWEVER very possibly negatively impacting HPTA axis and therefore marketing claims of such may be misleading.</p><p></p><p>FYI NATHAN BRYSON no longer works at ACERUS either lol... seems to have moved around ALOT for a guy with such high credentials... interesting that HE conducted alot of the research they did..... and left... I bet he isnt a shy sciency guy but a pretty quick witted salesman guy.. but im being negative and assuming.. could be they canned everyone vs some devious behaviour i suppose lol... just an annoyed particularly with this company being such a gong show. no ones asking the moon, simply follow through with what they had said AND fix product..</p><p></p><p>the reason pharmacists and DRs are confused is that they have not detailed this issue in the monograph.. as if its ok to use with shards they are suppost to say that or if shards are not ok they need to make that clear and accept loss for returned product.. they SAY its ok on the phone however interesting will never put that in print, also gave my pharmacy teh run around and feel bad for the lady as spent time on the phone, had to resend product after they sent it back after they gve her fedex # to send it too etc etc. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Thank you for posting the detailed information about test results... I do wish they posted individual data points or at least a few that we could see adrenal or testical pulses of testosterone staying intact between doses. while when suppression is of course folks with higher T will see greater AMOUNT of suppression, I dont think its a super great sign of keeping things functional.. but will take a closer read. a better sign would be all patients get similar low suppression in dose dependant manner and % of change may be helpful as MORE/greater is not uber informative IMO. </p><p></p><p>anyway, for investors i wouldn't be buying up stock lets say..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="granger, post: 277216, member: 45577"] agreed, concern is mostly hitting crystals and getting TOO high of test levels and random dosages which of course may impact HPTA aXIS alot more than standard dosing. because you cannot OD its not a big deal to public safety HOWEVER very possibly negatively impacting HPTA axis and therefore marketing claims of such may be misleading. FYI NATHAN BRYSON no longer works at ACERUS either lol... seems to have moved around ALOT for a guy with such high credentials... interesting that HE conducted alot of the research they did..... and left... I bet he isnt a shy sciency guy but a pretty quick witted salesman guy.. but im being negative and assuming.. could be they canned everyone vs some devious behaviour i suppose lol... just an annoyed particularly with this company being such a gong show. no ones asking the moon, simply follow through with what they had said AND fix product.. the reason pharmacists and DRs are confused is that they have not detailed this issue in the monograph.. as if its ok to use with shards they are suppost to say that or if shards are not ok they need to make that clear and accept loss for returned product.. they SAY its ok on the phone however interesting will never put that in print, also gave my pharmacy teh run around and feel bad for the lady as spent time on the phone, had to resend product after they sent it back after they gve her fedex # to send it too etc etc. Thank you for posting the detailed information about test results... I do wish they posted individual data points or at least a few that we could see adrenal or testical pulses of testosterone staying intact between doses. while when suppression is of course folks with higher T will see greater AMOUNT of suppression, I dont think its a super great sign of keeping things functional.. but will take a closer read. a better sign would be all patients get similar low suppression in dose dependant manner and % of change may be helpful as MORE/greater is not uber informative IMO. anyway, for investors i wouldn't be buying up stock lets say.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Natesto: large shards UPDATE- batch is all bad.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top