ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Nandrolone for Mood | Feeling much Better..
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JimGainz" data-source="post: 222177" data-attributes="member: 19127"><p>I am very well familiar with the studies deriding nandrolone as being 11x more damaging to the heart. The first one was on rabbits with supr-physiological doses in human terms. The study you posted was also a postulation by the researches - extrapolating effects on cells to “heavy long term exposure“ on the heart muscle. but no one can tell us what that means. There is a rich history of long term nandrolone use at physiological doses in the HIV / muscle wasting disease populations who ran it for decades until the FDA banned it in favor of Oxandrolone (anavar) which is way more toxic, at least to the liver, than nandrolone.</p><p></p><p>it good to be cautious but I don’t believe the negative hype. It reminds me of the old school doctors telling me that I was risking a heart attack and cancer going on therapeutic testosterone doses because of one flawed study they read. What a load of cr@p.</p><p></p><p>Regarding my own nandrolone use - I went on it for chronic joint pain. Before that, I was offered high doses of Ibuprofen, Celebrex, Medrol, and even a pain killer. So am I better taking that junk or low dose nandrolone? Or, live in pain and be miserable? I’ve made my choice and weighed the risks. I encourage others to do the same and not base the efficacy or danger of a drug based on some laboratory test - probably designed to promote fear and discourage use ( because modern medicine will rather have a person feel like garbage using “standard treatments” than god forbid use anabolic and change their life for the better.</p><p></p><p>Also, I monitor blood work using the most advanced predictor of heart disease / arterial calcification called the Cleveland Heart Lab test. It looks at inflammation markers across all vessels. I’ve been on nandrolone for over two years and had the best score my cardiologist ever saw in a patient and I’m over 50. (I know it’s not conclusive - but it’s encouraging). My personal opinion is that nandrolone’s incredible anti-inflammatory effect may have actually helped. We will never know. All I’m saying is that nandrolone should not be treated as of it were cocaine - it’s not all bad and have allowed many people to live life pain free which is a miracle for those of us stricken with injuries.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JimGainz, post: 222177, member: 19127"] I am very well familiar with the studies deriding nandrolone as being 11x more damaging to the heart. The first one was on rabbits with supr-physiological doses in human terms. The study you posted was also a postulation by the researches - extrapolating effects on cells to “heavy long term exposure“ on the heart muscle. but no one can tell us what that means. There is a rich history of long term nandrolone use at physiological doses in the HIV / muscle wasting disease populations who ran it for decades until the FDA banned it in favor of Oxandrolone (anavar) which is way more toxic, at least to the liver, than nandrolone. it good to be cautious but I don’t believe the negative hype. It reminds me of the old school doctors telling me that I was risking a heart attack and cancer going on therapeutic testosterone doses because of one flawed study they read. What a load of cr@p. Regarding my own nandrolone use - I went on it for chronic joint pain. Before that, I was offered high doses of Ibuprofen, Celebrex, Medrol, and even a pain killer. So am I better taking that junk or low dose nandrolone? Or, live in pain and be miserable? I’ve made my choice and weighed the risks. I encourage others to do the same and not base the efficacy or danger of a drug based on some laboratory test - probably designed to promote fear and discourage use ( because modern medicine will rather have a person feel like garbage using “standard treatments” than god forbid use anabolic and change their life for the better. Also, I monitor blood work using the most advanced predictor of heart disease / arterial calcification called the Cleveland Heart Lab test. It looks at inflammation markers across all vessels. I’ve been on nandrolone for over two years and had the best score my cardiologist ever saw in a patient and I’m over 50. (I know it’s not conclusive - but it’s encouraging). My personal opinion is that nandrolone’s incredible anti-inflammatory effect may have actually helped. We will never know. All I’m saying is that nandrolone should not be treated as of it were cocaine - it’s not all bad and have allowed many people to live life pain free which is a miracle for those of us stricken with injuries. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Nandrolone for Mood | Feeling much Better..
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
