ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Peptide Forums (GHRH, Sermorelin, etc)
General Peptide Use & Information
PEPTIDE RESULTS IN: IGF-1, testosterone, etc.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Guided_by_Voices" data-source="post: 248376" data-attributes="member: 15235"><p>No papers, just logic. If a round of GH for a reasonable period at minimum effective dose healed injuries that otherwise would not heal, and enabled faster recovery, and hence enabled greater activity, positive mindset and everything that comes with those (reduced inflammation, improved body composition, etc., which are in themselves anti-cancer, and CVD, and pro-insulin sensitivity) then those benefits might well outweigh any negatives. The anti-GH crowd uses poor evidence (e.g. people and mice who are GH-compromised from birth) and don't suggest a viable alternative. I don't know what the answer is and it is likely different from person to person, but just making a blanket statement is another example of single-variable fallacy. An irritating side-observation is that the anti-GH people I am aware of are not yet at an age where they would have experienced the phenomenon of random body parts breaking, and hence need to seek the perspective of those who know what that's like.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Guided_by_Voices, post: 248376, member: 15235"] No papers, just logic. If a round of GH for a reasonable period at minimum effective dose healed injuries that otherwise would not heal, and enabled faster recovery, and hence enabled greater activity, positive mindset and everything that comes with those (reduced inflammation, improved body composition, etc., which are in themselves anti-cancer, and CVD, and pro-insulin sensitivity) then those benefits might well outweigh any negatives. The anti-GH crowd uses poor evidence (e.g. people and mice who are GH-compromised from birth) and don't suggest a viable alternative. I don't know what the answer is and it is likely different from person to person, but just making a blanket statement is another example of single-variable fallacy. An irritating side-observation is that the anti-GH people I am aware of are not yet at an age where they would have experienced the phenomenon of random body parts breaking, and hence need to seek the perspective of those who know what that's like. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Peptide Forums (GHRH, Sermorelin, etc)
General Peptide Use & Information
PEPTIDE RESULTS IN: IGF-1, testosterone, etc.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top