ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
When Testosterone Is Not Enough
Penis Girth Enhancement Video
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nelson Vergel" data-source="post: 15899" data-attributes="member: 3"><p><strong>Penile lengthening and widening without grafting according to a modified sliding technique - Abstract</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p>To present the feasibility and safety of penile length and girth restoration based on a modified "sliding technique" for patients suffering from severe ED, significant penile shortening with or without Peyronie's disease.</p><p></p><p><strong>MATERIALS AND METHODS:</strong> Between January 2013 and January 2014, 143 patients underwent our modified "sliding technique" for penile length and girth restoration and concomitant penile prosthesis implantation. It is based on three key elements: 1) the sliding maneuver for penile length restoration, 2) potential complementary longitudinal ventral and/or dorsal tunical incisions for girth restoration, and 3) closure of the newly created rectangular bow-shaped tunical defects with Buck's fascia only.</p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>RESULTS:</strong> 143 patients underwent the procedure. The etiologies of penile shortening and narrowing were PD in 53.8%, severe ED with unsuccessful intracavernosal injection therapy in 21%, post-radical prostatectomy 14.7%, androgen deprivation therapy, with or without brachytherapy or external radiotherapy, for prostate cancer in 7%, post-penile fracture in 2.1%, post-redo-hypospadias repair 0.7%, and post-priapism in 0.7%. In cases of ED and PD, the mean deviation of the penile axis was 45° (range, 0-100°). The mean subjective penile shortening reported by patients was 3.4 cm (range, 1-7 cm), and shaft constriction was present in 53.8%. Malleable penile prostheses were used in 133 patients and inflatable penile prostheses were inserted in 10 patients. The median follow-up was 9.7 months (range, 6-18 months). The mean penile length gain was 3.1 cm (range, 2-7 cm). No penile prosthesis infection caused device explantation. The average IIEF score increased from 24 points at baseline to 60 points at the six-month follow-up.</p><p></p><p><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong> Penile length and girth restoration based on our modified "sliding technique" is a safe and effective procedure. The elimination of grafting saves operative time and consequently, decreases infection risk and costs associated with surgery.</p><p></p><p><strong>Written by:</strong> </p><p>Egydio PH, Kuehhas FE. </p><p><em>Centre for Peyronie's Disease Reconstruction, Sao Paulo, Brazil.</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nelson Vergel, post: 15899, member: 3"] [B]Penile lengthening and widening without grafting according to a modified sliding technique - Abstract[/B] To present the feasibility and safety of penile length and girth restoration based on a modified "sliding technique" for patients suffering from severe ED, significant penile shortening with or without Peyronie's disease. [B]MATERIALS AND METHODS:[/B] Between January 2013 and January 2014, 143 patients underwent our modified "sliding technique" for penile length and girth restoration and concomitant penile prosthesis implantation. It is based on three key elements: 1) the sliding maneuver for penile length restoration, 2) potential complementary longitudinal ventral and/or dorsal tunical incisions for girth restoration, and 3) closure of the newly created rectangular bow-shaped tunical defects with Buck's fascia only. [B] RESULTS:[/B] 143 patients underwent the procedure. The etiologies of penile shortening and narrowing were PD in 53.8%, severe ED with unsuccessful intracavernosal injection therapy in 21%, post-radical prostatectomy 14.7%, androgen deprivation therapy, with or without brachytherapy or external radiotherapy, for prostate cancer in 7%, post-penile fracture in 2.1%, post-redo-hypospadias repair 0.7%, and post-priapism in 0.7%. In cases of ED and PD, the mean deviation of the penile axis was 45° (range, 0-100°). The mean subjective penile shortening reported by patients was 3.4 cm (range, 1-7 cm), and shaft constriction was present in 53.8%. Malleable penile prostheses were used in 133 patients and inflatable penile prostheses were inserted in 10 patients. The median follow-up was 9.7 months (range, 6-18 months). The mean penile length gain was 3.1 cm (range, 2-7 cm). No penile prosthesis infection caused device explantation. The average IIEF score increased from 24 points at baseline to 60 points at the six-month follow-up. [B]CONCLUSION:[/B] Penile length and girth restoration based on our modified "sliding technique" is a safe and effective procedure. The elimination of grafting saves operative time and consequently, decreases infection risk and costs associated with surgery. [B]Written by:[/B] Egydio PH, Kuehhas FE. [I]Centre for Peyronie's Disease Reconstruction, Sao Paulo, Brazil.[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
When Testosterone Is Not Enough
Penis Girth Enhancement Video
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top