ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
IM versus Sub-q T Injections: Effect on TT, hematocrit, E2, and PSA
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tareload" data-source="post: 199917"><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.excelmale.com/forum/threads/hematocrit-and-trt-how-to-have-balance.23281/post-199842[/URL]</p><p></p><p>Clarifying comments that could be used to improve subsequent study to validate hypotheses discussed above. Thanks for clarifying with the author [USER=41390]@bennettjc[/USER] on the study details!</p><p></p><p><em>I don't think we have enough information about that study to make meaningful conclusions. If I remember correctly, I thought my takeaway was the weekly dose for the control arm of the study was different that the Xyosted-equivalent arm:</em></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><em> - Compare 75 mg/week or 100 mg/week (pick a number) of TC dose-equivalent - dosed every day vs once weekly for the win! Test hypothesis that dosing frequency makes a difference (peak vs trough, etc).</em></p><p><em></em></p><p> <em>- Or compare sub-Q vs IM once per week at XX mg/week.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>- But please don't compare Xyosted dosed at 75-100 mg/week vs TC at 100 mg/week, then have two different groups wrt mean age and conclude that Xyosted is the winner. My Hct at 70 mg/week TC very different than at 100 mg/week (same dosing frequency). Some of us very sensitive evidently.</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tareload, post: 199917"] [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.excelmale.com/forum/threads/hematocrit-and-trt-how-to-have-balance.23281/post-199842[/URL] Clarifying comments that could be used to improve subsequent study to validate hypotheses discussed above. Thanks for clarifying with the author [USER=41390]@bennettjc[/USER] on the study details! [I]I don't think we have enough information about that study to make meaningful conclusions. If I remember correctly, I thought my takeaway was the weekly dose for the control arm of the study was different that the Xyosted-equivalent arm:[/I] [I] - Compare 75 mg/week or 100 mg/week (pick a number) of TC dose-equivalent - dosed every day vs once weekly for the win! Test hypothesis that dosing frequency makes a difference (peak vs trough, etc). - Or compare sub-Q vs IM once per week at XX mg/week. - But please don't compare Xyosted dosed at 75-100 mg/week vs TC at 100 mg/week, then have two different groups wrt mean age and conclude that Xyosted is the winner. My Hct at 70 mg/week TC very different than at 100 mg/week (same dosing frequency). Some of us very sensitive evidently.[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
IM versus Sub-q T Injections: Effect on TT, hematocrit, E2, and PSA
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top