ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
When Testosterone Is Not Enough
AVAILABILITY OF GONADOTROPIN THERAPY FROM FDA-APPROVED PHARMACIES
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="madman" data-source="post: 248816" data-attributes="member: 13851"><p>Nelson, have you seen this yet?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><em>Empower Pharmacy appeals the denial of its petition for judicial review that challenged adverse administrative action by the Iowa Board of Pharmacy for a violation of Iowa Administrative Code rule 657-20.12, governing compound preparations that are essentially copies of approved drugs. Empower argues the district court erred in determining: (1) the rule is not unconstitutionally vague, (2) it was afforded due process in the administrative proceeding, (3) the Board’s decision was supported by substantial evidence, and (4) the sanction levied was appropriate. We affirm.</em></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>IV. </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Conclusion </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong><em>We affirm the district court’s denial of Empower’s petition for judicial review, finding the rule is not unconstitutionally vague, Empower was afforded due process, substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision, and the sanction imposed was not an unreasonable abuse of discretion.</em></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="madman, post: 248816, member: 13851"] Nelson, have you seen this yet? [B][I]Empower Pharmacy appeals the denial of its petition for judicial review that challenged adverse administrative action by the Iowa Board of Pharmacy for a violation of Iowa Administrative Code rule 657-20.12, governing compound preparations that are essentially copies of approved drugs. Empower argues the district court erred in determining: (1) the rule is not unconstitutionally vague, (2) it was afforded due process in the administrative proceeding, (3) the Board’s decision was supported by substantial evidence, and (4) the sanction levied was appropriate. We affirm.[/I] IV. Conclusion [I]We affirm the district court’s denial of Empower’s petition for judicial review, finding the rule is not unconstitutionally vague, Empower was afforded due process, substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision, and the sanction imposed was not an unreasonable abuse of discretion.[/I][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
When Testosterone Is Not Enough
AVAILABILITY OF GONADOTROPIN THERAPY FROM FDA-APPROVED PHARMACIES
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top